« James gets it right (again) | Home | Visualisation voodoo »
October 31, 2006
Meg White in Marks & Spencer's
I've walked past this mannequin (is that the word?) for a week know and stop and stare every time I go in to buy a sandwich. I'm guessing this particular model is based on Kate Moss, but the hair-style, the lighting and position make her a doppelgänger for Meg White :-)
By Dug Falby on 9:27 AM
Tags: manequins, meg, meg white, white stripes
![\"meg-big-crop.gif\"](\"http://www.donkeyontheedge.com/i/meg-big.jpg\")
\n\nI've walked past this mannequin (is that the word?) for a week know and stop and stare every time I go in to buy a sandwich. I'm guessing this particular model is based on Kate Moss, but the hair-style, the lighting and position make her a doppelgänger for \"Meg White\":http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2006/09/is_meg_white_ex.html :-)Search
Categories
- Advertising and digital marcomms (84)
- Appeals (16)
- Blog stuff (31)
- Bugs (1)
- Business transformation (2)
- Content and SEO (3)
- CSS3 (1)
- Design and usability (123)
- Dug's random musings (572)
- Family (100)
- Film and television (11)
- flickr (7)
- Food (14)
- Fun Stuff (7)
- Gardening (2)
- Good-value lunches (4)
- Google (3)
- Internet culture and politics (147)
- Jed's guest blogging (3)
- Le enraged mutton (65)
- Linkage (152)
- Memory (12)
- Music (18)
- Petrolheading (5)
- Picture stuff (13)
- Politics (7)
- Poor-value lunches (2)
- SCUD (2)
- Techno-bollocks (179)
- Terrorists (7)
- wtf (2)
Monthly Archives
- August 2011 (1)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (9)
- March 2011 (5)
- February 2011 (6)
- January 2011 (1)
- December 2010 (4)
- November 2010 (4)
- October 2010 (5)
- September 2010 (6)
- August 2010 (10)
- July 2010 (18)
- June 2010 (11)
- May 2010 (34)
- April 2010 (8)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (17)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (14)
- October 2009 (8)
- September 2009 (12)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (9)
- June 2009 (10)
- May 2009 (3)
- April 2009 (7)
- March 2009 (20)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (15)
- October 2008 (18)
- September 2008 (11)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (8)
- June 2008 (11)
- May 2008 (10)
- April 2008 (20)
- March 2008 (18)
- February 2008 (14)
- January 2008 (27)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (12)
- October 2007 (10)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (13)
- July 2007 (17)
- June 2007 (15)
- May 2007 (26)
- April 2007 (14)
- March 2007 (24)
- February 2007 (20)
- January 2007 (6)
- December 2006 (13)
- November 2006 (14)
- October 2006 (13)
- September 2006 (9)
- August 2006 (10)
- July 2006 (21)
- June 2006 (20)
- May 2006 (13)
- April 2006 (6)
- March 2006 (12)
- February 2006 (11)
- January 2006 (18)
- December 2005 (10)
- November 2005 (26)
- October 2005 (16)
- September 2005 (14)
- August 2005 (3)
- July 2005 (20)
- June 2005 (11)
- May 2005 (15)
- April 2005 (12)
- March 2005 (7)
- February 2005 (19)
- January 2005 (21)
- December 2004 (7)
- November 2004 (4)
- October 2004 (26)
- September 2004 (39)
- August 2004 (25)
- July 2004 (1)
- June 2004 (12)
- May 2004 (8)
- April 2004 (4)
- March 2004 (8)
- February 2004 (10)
- January 2004 (12)
- December 2003 (13)
- November 2003 (6)
- September 2003 (8)
- August 2003 (13)
- July 2003 (14)
- June 2003 (9)
- May 2003 (18)
- April 2003 (7)
- March 2003 (24)
- February 2003 (19)
- January 2003 (12)
- December 2002 (21)
- November 2002 (19)
- October 2002 (30)
- September 2002 (43)
- August 2002 (42)
- July 2002 (37)
- June 2002 (20)
- May 2002 (64)
- April 2002 (19)
- March 2002 (16)
- February 2002 (25)
- January 2002 (12)
- December 2001 (1)
Pages
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Dug Falby published on October 31, 2006 9:27 AM.
James gets it right (again) was the previous entry in this blog.
Visualisation voodoo is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.